Buy custom Supreme Court Case of Dennis v. United States, 1951

Essay's paper info

Essay's paper body

"The obvious purpose of the statute is to protect existing Government, not from change by peaceable, lawful, and constitutional means but from change by violence, revolution, and terrorism," Vinson wrote. The Court believed that the actions of the leaders in organizing the Communist party presented a "clear and present danger" to the government, even if the success of the conspiracy was not likely...

As Chief Justice Vinson stated: "It is the existence of the conspiracy which creates the danger. If the ingredients of the reaction are present, we cannot bind the Government to wait until the catalyst is added" before acting to protect society from the danger that will result. In effect, Vinson revised the clear and present danger standard, accepting the opinion of Judge Learned Hand that since a "clear and probable danger" existed, the government had a right to protect itself...

General points of the essay

Constitutional Foundations for the United States Democratic Republic DICKERSON V. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Dennis v. United States, 341 U.S. 494 (1951) Did WW2 act as a catalyst for change with regard to race relations and civil rights in the United States? Executive Salaries and What it Means to the United States supreme court desicion of hypothetical case The End To Violence Means The Need For Change Supreme Court Case of Dennis v. United States, 1951 The United States Government Abortion United States Supreme Court in the 1973 How can the United States of America better defend itself against terrorism? Supreme Court Case Miller v. California Supreme Court Needs a change The climate change debate in the United States United States Government vs. North Korean Government

Essays related to the topic